It would be great if whole projects or whole structures could be cloned, not just individual designs
Allow a design to be un-certified and re-certified. This might be needed if a new certification requirement arises (such as if a new rating scheme is being applied that requires additional certification checks), or if changes need to be made post-certification.
When using the scenarios feature it is common to model scenarios that are not progressed in the main tree. Currently those “branch” scenarios are not included in the LCA and LCD Feedback reports. It would be valuable for clients and receivers of these reports if all of the side branch scenarios modelled were included in […]
It would be useful to be able to report (generate reports) with any combination of the design functions, i.e. in a design with 4 functions, be able to create reports covering 2 of those functions. This would be particularly useful for infrastructure projects, which often contain several functions, but would also provide extra functionality for […]
It would be great if the cumulative savings could be shown against the proposed and improved designs when using the scenarios feature. Currently this row only shows 0s.
I would like to be able to use the scenarios function for a new design in an existing structure without affecting recommendations already recorded for another design within the same structure. An example of where this applies is to projects that are moving to the final design phase – and so need a ‘Final’ design […]
I think this is important to prevent eTool reports being misrepresented for a building that was assessed at a preliminary design stage. This will be particularly useful for LCD Lite assessments where no As-Built assessment is conducted, but the builder wants to present the (potential) LCA results to the client without watermarks.