I believe your question is related to this post on the lack of normalisation & weighting in additional indicators.
Timber and concrete are two very different products therefore it is not surprising to see an increase in impacts for other indicators when replacing concrete with timber. The question is whether these indicators are equal in importance/weight with all other indicators in terms of what we’re ultimately trying to achieve – i.e. reducing global warming potential (GWP) impacts.
Please refer to the support post linked above for more information on indicator normalisation & weighting.