Certifier Review Statement – Improvement

eToolLCD Features Requests Certifier Review Statement – Improvement
1
2 years ago
Rodrigo
open0
Motivation (why we need this feature): To improve transparency and granularity of studies that use the Scenarios tool., Which regions need the feature?: Global, Which projects types does the feature support?: Buildings, Infrastructure, Fit Outs, Landscaping, Other, Which ratings systems require the feature?: All,

The new Scenarios feature is very helpful to assess different strategies individually. However, when a Proposed Design is modelled and certified using it, the Certifier Review Statement only pulls the certification communication (quality check iterations) from the last scenario, which decreases the transparency and granularity of the final analysis.

Related Ideas

Un-Certify – Re-Certify Design Feature

open2 years agoAllow a design to be un-certified and re-certified. This might be needed if a new certification requirement arises (such as if a new rating scheme is ...Read more Un-Certify – Re-Certify Design Feature

Simultaneous Scenarios and Recommendations within a Structure

open3 years agoI would like to be able to use the scenarios function for a new design in an existing structure without affecting recommendations already recorded for...Read more Simultaneous Scenarios and Recommendations within a Structure

Include “Branch” Scenarios in LCA Reports

open2 years agoWhen using the scenarios feature it is common to model scenarios that are not progressed in the main tree. Currently those "branch" scenario...Read more Include “Branch” Scenarios in LCA Reports

Leave A Comment?

You must be logged in to post a comment.